For UK law firms · Fixed-fee · On-site · 3–4 weeks
We spend a few days on-site and come back with a prioritised, costed map of the AI opportunities with the most upside — every one modelled from your matter data.
Let's talkYou leave with a documented lifecycle blueprint and a prioritised AI roadmap — and you own both whether or not you build a single AI feature.
A documented as-is model of how your firm actually works — stages, handoffs, human decision gates, systems, data ownership, and accountability per stage across your practice areas.
Valuable in its own right: most firms have never documented this. You walk away with a lifecycle and data model whether or not you pursue a single AI initiative.
AI candidates mapped per lifecycle stage and cross-cutting — each scored on feasibility, data-readiness, and effort, with ROI modelled as conservative / expected / upside ranges from your own matter data.
Ends with a costed view of implementing your top three opportunities — the bridge to delivery.
01
1 week
Confirm practice areas in scope, access requirements, and data sources.
02
2–4 days
Interviews, observation, and matter/time/system data collection.
03
1–2 weeks
Build the blueprint, score AI candidates, and model ROI from your data.
04
Half-day
Workshop the findings and roadmap with your leadership team.
Typical elapsed time: 3–4 weeks from kickoff to readout. Fixed-fee — you know the cost before you start.
The differentiator is that every ROI figure is built from your own matter data, gathered on-site — not vendor benchmarks or cross-industry averages. ROI is always presented as a range with stated assumptions your leadership team can stress-test.
The on-site visit is what earns the right to quote a defensible figure. That is why this is a fixed-fee engagement, not a desktop exercise.
The blueprint has standalone value. You own a documented lifecycle and data model whether or not you ever build an AI feature — that removes the wasted-spend risk entirely.
Bespoke work is exactly why a tool-first approach fails. Mapping the variants is the point — the blueprint captures how your firm actually works, not a vendor's generic model.
Yes — modelled from your own matter volume, time-recording, and fee-earner cost data, presented as a range with explicit assumptions you can challenge.
This gives them an evidence base and a prioritised roadmap, not another tool to evaluate. It's the input they need to make a defensible case to leadership.
Fixed-fee engagement. You own the deliverables. Get in touch to discuss scope and timing.
Let's talkTell me a little about your firm and I'll tell you honestly whether the review is worth doing. If it isn't right for where you are, I'll say so. No proposal, no follow-up sequence.
Someone will be in touch with you as soon as possible.